<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/01/14/former-nebraska-state-senators-family-flees-flames-in-los-angeles-area/">Nebraska Examiner</a>

LINCOLN — Suitcases are packed. The cat carrier is by the front door. And the family of former State Sen. Abbie Cornett is ready to flee again, if necessary, the horrific fires torching neighborhoods near their home in Los Angeles County.

The family, who has lived in the L.A. suburb of Monrovia for 11 years, fled once already — a week ago when wildfires blew out of containment, powered by up to 100 mph winds and extreme drought conditions. As of midday Tuesday, more than 12,000 structures and been destroyed or damaged, 24 people had died, and an area comparable in size to half of Omaha was blackened.

“It was like a hurricane with fire and without rain,” said Cornett via cell phone. “It’s really rough in places. It looks like a nuclear holocaust.”

Roads were strewn with ash and debris, sort of like the aftermath of a midwestern tornado, she said. One of the family’s cars suffered two flat tires as they fled, forcing them to leave it behind.

Ultimately, though, the Eaton Canyon fire, the one closest to their home, burned away from their residence.

On Monday, Cornett was cleaning up the ash that coated the inside of their home, gathering up clothing and toys to donate to relief efforts and hoping the latest forecasts of a resumption of Santa Ana winds, with gusts up to 70 mph, don’t exacerbate the spread of the four active fires in the L.A. area.

“We’re on pins and needles,” she said.

While their home was spared, others — including some former Nebraskans she knows — weren’t so lucky, losing homes and a lifetime of possessions. Along major streets, there are people standing in line for food and water and donation centers “everywhere,” Cornett said, plus calls for people to temporarily house pets displaced by the fires.

“So many people need so much help out here,” she said. “It is not a red or blue issue. It just isn’t. This is a humanitarian issue.”

Cornett added that many of the fire victims lacked insurance because several companies have stopped offering coverage in California — due to the spate of recent calamities — and homeowners couldn’t afford the high-cost of the remaining policies.

“Knock on wood, we came out really lucky. There are too many people out here who didn’t,” she said.

They returned to their home on Thursday and power was restored on Friday, said Cornett, who represented the Bellevue area in the Nebraska Legislature from 2005 to 2013.

The former senator, now a writer for a health magazine and the host of a podcast, hasn’t lost her sense of humor. On Saturday, her family hosted some neighbors whose electricity was still out. They watched the film, “Backdraft,” and sipped on a red wine called “Inferno.”

“If you can’t laugh at it, you’re just going to curl up and cry,” Cornett said.

Ironically, she said, the Los Angeles fires broke out on the same week, 17 years earlier, when their family’s home in Bellevue&nbsp;<a href="https://journalstar.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/state-senators-home-destroyed-by-fire/article_20e20b4e-2bd9-5519-9795-c4d32f461358.html" target="_blank">burned while she was serving</a>.

Cornett said she is soon to compile work on a second master’s degree, this one in health care administration, and wants to continue to live in the area to follow the movie and television careers of their twin daughters, Victoria and Madison. The twins use their mother’s middle name, Abbott, as their last name for their film work. A third daughter, Cameron, is planning to attend college this spring.

But she admitted that she told her husband “we’re moving to Palm Springs” amid the fury of the fires.

“I don’t think anyone who lives in California doesn’t have a love-hate relationship with it,” Cornett said.

“Insurance is insane, traffic is insane, they have ‘fire season’ — it’s not a season in Nebraska, it’s an element — and homelessness is horrible,” she said. “But it has its charms. And for the twins, it’s where they work.”

Paul Hammel<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/01/14/former-nebraska-state-senators-family-flees-flames-in-los-angeles-area/">Nebraska Examiner</a>LINCOLN — Suitcases are packed. The cat carrier is by the front door. And the family of former State Sen. Abbie Cornett is ready to flee again, if necessary, the horrific fires torching neighborhoods near their home in Los Angeles County.The family, who has lived in the L.A. suburb of Monrovia for 11 years, fled once already — a week ago when wildfires blew out of containment, powered by up to 100 mph winds and extreme drought conditions. As of midday Tuesday, more than 12,000 structures and been destroyed or damaged, 24 people had died, and an area comparable in size to half of Omaha was blackened.“It was like a hurricane with fire and without rain,” said Cornett via cell phone. “It’s really rough in places. It looks like a nuclear holocaust.”<h2>Strewn with debris</h2>Roads were strewn with ash and debris, sort of like the aftermath of a midwestern tornado, she said. One of the family’s cars suffered two flat tires as they fled, forcing them to leave it behind.Ultimately, though, the Eaton Canyon fire, the one closest to their home, burned away from their residence.On Monday, Cornett was cleaning up the ash that coated the inside of their home, gathering up clothing and toys to donate to relief efforts and hoping the latest forecasts of a resumption of Santa Ana winds, with gusts up to 70 mph, don’t exacerbate the spread of the four active fires in the L.A. area.“We’re on pins and needles,” she said.While their home was spared, others — including some former Nebraskans she knows — weren’t so lucky, losing homes and a lifetime of possessions. Along major streets, there are people standing in line for food and water and donation centers “everywhere,” Cornett said, plus calls for people to temporarily house pets displaced by the fires.“So many people need so much help out here,” she said. “It is not a red or blue issue. It just isn’t. This is a humanitarian issue.”Cornett added that many of the fire victims lacked insurance because several companies have stopped offering coverage in California — due to the spate of recent calamities — and homeowners couldn’t afford the high-cost of the remaining policies.“Knock on wood, we came out really lucky. There are too many people out here who didn’t,” she said.They returned to their home on Thursday and power was restored on Friday, said Cornett, who represented the Bellevue area in the Nebraska Legislature from 2005 to 2013.<h2>Humor in sadness</h2>The former senator, now a writer for a health magazine and the host of a podcast, hasn’t lost her sense of humor. On Saturday, her family hosted some neighbors whose electricity was still out. They watched the film, “Backdraft,” and sipped on a red wine called “Inferno.”“If you can’t laugh at it, you’re just going to curl up and cry,” Cornett said.Ironically, she said, the Los Angeles fires broke out on the same week, 17 years earlier, when their family’s home in Bellevue&nbsp;<a href="https://journalstar.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/state-senators-home-destroyed-by-fire/article_20e20b4e-2bd9-5519-9795-c4d32f461358.html" target="_blank">burned while she was serving</a>.Cornett said she is soon to compile work on a second master’s degree, this one in health care administration, and wants to continue to live in the area to follow the movie and television careers of their twin daughters, Victoria and Madison. The twins use their mother’s middle name, Abbott, as their last name for their film work. A third daughter, Cameron, is planning to attend college this spring.But she admitted that she told her husband “we’re moving to Palm Springs” amid the fury of the fires.“I don’t think anyone who lives in California doesn’t have a love-hate relationship with it,” Cornett said.“Insurance is insane, traffic is insane, they have ‘fire season’ — it’s not a season in Nebraska, it’s an element — and homelessness is horrible,” she said. “But it has its charms. And for the twins, it’s where they work.”

Former Nebraska State Senator’s Family Flees Flames in L.A. Area

Office of U.S. Senator Deb Fischer

&nbsp; WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the top Republican on the Strategic Forces Subcommittee, questioned Pete Hegseth at&nbsp;the confirmation hearing on his expected nomination to be Secretary of Defense.

During the hearing, Senator Fischer asked Hegseth about his stance on nuclear deterrence and emphasized the critical importance of maintaining a robust nuclear triad. She also questioned him on his plans to transform the culture within the Department of Defense to enhance efficiency and expedite the delivery of nuclear capabilities.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Senator Fischer questions Pete Hegseth:

Senator Fischer:&nbsp;Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and welcome, Mr. Hegseth, to you and to your family. Thank you for the meeting that we had; we talked about a number of things. First and foremost was that nuclear weapons are foundational to our national defense and having a safe, effective and credible nuclear deterrent underpins our alliances, and as you know, deters our adversaries. Nuclear deterrence has been and—you and I, I believe, agreed on this—it must continue to be, unequivocally, the highest priority mission of the Department of Defense. But deterrence only works if our adversaries believe our nuclear forces are effective and credible. All three legs of our triad are undergoing generational recapitalization programs, and we cannot afford any more delays in those programs, Sir, do you believe and agree with President Trump's 2018 Nuclear Posture Review that preventing adversary and nuclear attacks is “the highest priority of the United States”?

Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;Senator, yes, I do.&nbsp;

Senator Fischer:&nbsp;If confirmed, will you commit to supporting all three legs of the nuclear triad and using every tool available to deliver these systems on schedule?

Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;Senator, yes, I do. Because ultimately, our deterrence, our survival, is reliant upon the capability—the perception and the reality of the capability—of our nuclear triad. We have to invest in its modernization for the defense of our nation.

Senator Fischer:&nbsp;While former Secretaries of Defense have stated that nuclear deterrence is the highest priority, we haven't really seen that translated into budget requests or using the tools like the Defense Production Act. You've spoken about increasing lethality. You've spoken about getting programs done faster. How would you actually implement a culture change so that we can see these delivery schedules move forward? I can tell you, in most every briefing we have, the schedules we're on are too late. So, what would you do?&nbsp;

Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;Well, ultimately, focus first on the things that are most important, as we have discussed, Senator: the nuclear triad, understanding—whether it's the B-21 or the Minuteman to the Sentinel, all aspects of the Columbia-class submarines, ballistic missiles—what are the priorities that need to be focused on. And ensure that in those particular cases—you mentioned it, Senator—use the Defense Production Act, emergency powers. If we're at a place where our nuclear capabilities are perceived to not be what they are, that is an emergency. And we have an ally in our incoming commander-in-chief, in President Donald Trump, who has spoken about these things, understands the power and strength of nuclear deterrence, will not allow them to be deprioritized.

Senator Fischer:&nbsp;But it’s the existential threat. It’s the existential threat to this nation. How do you change the culture? It's not just the Defense Production Act that's going to be able to do it. How are you going to move forward faster?

Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;Competition. Senator, it’s important, critically important. The Death Valley that was talked about, leveraging the innovation of Silicon Valley, which for the first time in generations, has shown a willingness, desire, and capability to bring its best technologies to bear at the Pentagon, a Pentagon that has become too insular and tries to block new technologies from coming in. So, we have to embrace that. There's some great Office of Strategic Capital, DIU initiatives that provide loans to companies to participate. Because you have to invest in the defense industrial base for the longer-term projects we have to have the capability for, the missiles and the munitions, but also to rapidly field emerging technologies that we need on the battlefield right now. So, as we learn things, say, in the war in Ukraine, those technologies: as we look at threats we're going to face, find ways to rapidly field those using off the shelf technologies or standard designs, modular designs. Another easy one, Senator, that became evident in the process is digital designs. The Pentagon often builds entire systems without first using a digital design, which means you build prototypes and then scrap them and start over again. No private sector business could survive doing business that way. So, there's a lot of innovation, and I'm going to hire a lot of smart people—already have—to help with that.S

enator Fischer:&nbsp;The 2025 NDAA, it established a new position, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear Deterrence, Chemical and Biological Defense Policy and Programs. And that was established so we could cut through a lot of the bureaucratic stovepipes that that we see in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. If confirmed, will you direct the Department of Defense components to expeditiously implement this reform?

Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;I would want to look directly at exactly what that reform is. I take your word that it is great, Senator. I will review it robustly, and I look forward to implementing it.

Senator Fischer:&nbsp;Okay, thank you. During the first Trump administration, the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review concluded that the US needed to once again develop and deploy a nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile known as SLCM-N, to offset significant Russian and Chinese advantages in theater range nuclear capabilities. Since then, Congress, on a strong bipartisan basis, has directed the Navy and the National Nuclear Security Administration to continue this effort. Do you support the SLCM-N program?

Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;As of right now, Senator, based on what I know, I do. But one of my answers I'll have repeatedly throughout this morning is getting an opportunity to look under the hood of classified material, get an understanding of true capabilities vis-à-vis enemy capabilities. Because what we know right now on the nuclear side is that Russia and China are rushing to modernize and build arsenals larger than ours. We need to match threats to capabilities, and the systems we elevate will be tied to whether those capabilities are needed based on the adversaries we face. Yes, ma’am?

Senator Fischer:&nbsp;Would you ensure that this program is executed according to law?

Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;Absolutely, absolutely, Senator.

Senator Fischer:&nbsp;What is your plan to revitalize the industrial base in this country?

Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;Serious investment targeted at systems that we truly need by also incentivizing competition and laser focus from the OSD, from the Office of Secretary of Defense, to all the particular strategic initiatives to revive them. So, it's not just one system, it's multiple systems.

Office of U.S. Senator Deb Fischer&nbsp; WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the top Republican on the Strategic Forces Subcommittee, questioned Pete Hegseth at&nbsp;the confirmation hearing on his expected nomination to be Secretary of Defense.During the hearing, Senator Fischer asked Hegseth about his stance on nuclear deterrence and emphasized the critical importance of maintaining a robust nuclear triad. She also questioned him on his plans to transform the culture within the Department of Defense to enhance efficiency and expedite the delivery of nuclear capabilities.&nbsp;&nbsp;Senator Fischer questions Pete Hegseth:Senator Fischer:&nbsp;Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and welcome, Mr. Hegseth, to you and to your family. Thank you for the meeting that we had; we talked about a number of things. First and foremost was that nuclear weapons are foundational to our national defense and having a safe, effective and credible nuclear deterrent underpins our alliances, and as you know, deters our adversaries. Nuclear deterrence has been and—you and I, I believe, agreed on this—it must continue to be, unequivocally, the highest priority mission of the Department of Defense. But deterrence only works if our adversaries believe our nuclear forces are effective and credible. All three legs of our triad are undergoing generational recapitalization programs, and we cannot afford any more delays in those programs, Sir, do you believe and agree with President Trump's 2018 Nuclear Posture Review that preventing adversary and nuclear attacks is “the highest priority of the United States”?Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;Senator, yes, I do.&nbsp;Senator Fischer:&nbsp;If confirmed, will you commit to supporting all three legs of the nuclear triad and using every tool available to deliver these systems on schedule?Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;Senator, yes, I do. Because ultimately, our deterrence, our survival, is reliant upon the capability—the perception and the reality of the capability—of our nuclear triad. We have to invest in its modernization for the defense of our nation.Senator Fischer:&nbsp;While former Secretaries of Defense have stated that nuclear deterrence is the highest priority, we haven't really seen that translated into budget requests or using the tools like the Defense Production Act. You've spoken about increasing lethality. You've spoken about getting programs done faster. How would you actually implement a culture change so that we can see these delivery schedules move forward? I can tell you, in most every briefing we have, the schedules we're on are too late. So, what would you do?&nbsp;Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;Well, ultimately, focus first on the things that are most important, as we have discussed, Senator: the nuclear triad, understanding—whether it's the B-21 or the Minuteman to the Sentinel, all aspects of the Columbia-class submarines, ballistic missiles—what are the priorities that need to be focused on. And ensure that in those particular cases—you mentioned it, Senator—use the Defense Production Act, emergency powers. If we're at a place where our nuclear capabilities are perceived to not be what they are, that is an emergency. And we have an ally in our incoming commander-in-chief, in President Donald Trump, who has spoken about these things, understands the power and strength of nuclear deterrence, will not allow them to be deprioritized.Senator Fischer:&nbsp;But it’s the existential threat. It’s the existential threat to this nation. How do you change the culture? It's not just the Defense Production Act that's going to be able to do it. How are you going to move forward faster?Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;Competition. Senator, it’s important, critically important. The Death Valley that was talked about, leveraging the innovation of Silicon Valley, which for the first time in generations, has shown a willingness, desire, and capability to bring its best technologies to bear at the Pentagon, a Pentagon that has become too insular and tries to block new technologies from coming in. So, we have to embrace that. There's some great Office of Strategic Capital, DIU initiatives that provide loans to companies to participate. Because you have to invest in the defense industrial base for the longer-term projects we have to have the capability for, the missiles and the munitions, but also to rapidly field emerging technologies that we need on the battlefield right now. So, as we learn things, say, in the war in Ukraine, those technologies: as we look at threats we're going to face, find ways to rapidly field those using off the shelf technologies or standard designs, modular designs. Another easy one, Senator, that became evident in the process is digital designs. The Pentagon often builds entire systems without first using a digital design, which means you build prototypes and then scrap them and start over again. No private sector business could survive doing business that way. So, there's a lot of innovation, and I'm going to hire a lot of smart people—already have—to help with that.Senator Fischer:&nbsp;The 2025 NDAA, it established a new position, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear Deterrence, Chemical and Biological Defense Policy and Programs. And that was established so we could cut through a lot of the bureaucratic stovepipes that that we see in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. If confirmed, will you direct the Department of Defense components to expeditiously implement this reform?Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;I would want to look directly at exactly what that reform is. I take your word that it is great, Senator. I will review it robustly, and I look forward to implementing it.Senator Fischer:&nbsp;Okay, thank you. During the first Trump administration, the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review concluded that the US needed to once again develop and deploy a nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile known as SLCM-N, to offset significant Russian and Chinese advantages in theater range nuclear capabilities. Since then, Congress, on a strong bipartisan basis, has directed the Navy and the National Nuclear Security Administration to continue this effort. Do you support the SLCM-N program?Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;As of right now, Senator, based on what I know, I do. But one of my answers I'll have repeatedly throughout this morning is getting an opportunity to look under the hood of classified material, get an understanding of true capabilities vis-à-vis enemy capabilities. Because what we know right now on the nuclear side is that Russia and China are rushing to modernize and build arsenals larger than ours. We need to match threats to capabilities, and the systems we elevate will be tied to whether those capabilities are needed based on the adversaries we face. Yes, ma’am?Senator Fischer:&nbsp;Would you ensure that this program is executed according to law?Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;Absolutely, absolutely, Senator.Senator Fischer:&nbsp;What is your plan to revitalize the industrial base in this country?Pete Hegseth:&nbsp;Serious investment targeted at systems that we truly need by also incentivizing competition and laser focus from the OSD, from the Office of Secretary of Defense, to all the particular strategic initiatives to revive them. So, it's not just one system, it's multiple systems.

Fischer Questions Pete Hegseth at Confirmation Hearing

Nebraska's Natural Resources District

LINCOLN, Nebraska&nbsp;– The Nebraska Association of Resources Districts hosts their annual Legislative Conference to highlight partnerships and discuss natural resources policy at the Lincoln Embassy Suites Jan. 28-29, 2025.

The two-day conference brings together Natural Resources Districts (NRDs), elected officials and public-private partners integrally involved in conservation, technology, and policymaking. The conference also provides attendees an opportunity to learn how Nebraska’s NRDs work with landowners, state and federal agencies, and members of the public to protect Nebraska’s natural resources.

Governor Jim Pillen will kick off the event Tuesday, Jan. 28, followed by a property tax reform panel with the Nebraska Chamber of Commerce, Nebraska Farm Bureau, and Nebraska Association of School Boards; and a discussion of proposed legislation of interest to the NRDs. During the evening Senators Reception, NRD leaders will meet with state senators to discuss natural resources challenges and successes in the districts.

The conference continues Wednesday, Jan. 29, with breakout sessions for attendees, including:

More than 300 natural resources stakeholders are expected to attend the conference, which is presented by Nebraska’s Natural Resources Districts with a range of local and national sponsors including Blue Cross Blue Shield Nebraska, Eastern Nebraska Water Resources Assessment (ENWRA), HDR, Houston Engineering Inc., JEO Consulting Group, Olsson, Nebraska Department of Natural Resources, The Daugherty Water for Food Global Institute and The Nebraska Water Center.

Conference registration is available on the Nebraska Association of Resources Districts’ website:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nrdnet.org/events" target="_blank">https://www.nrdnet.org/events</a>.

The Nebraska Association of Resources Districts (NARD), the trade association for Nebraska's 23 Natural Resources Districts (NRD), works with individual districts to protect lives, property and the future of Nebraska’s natural resources. NRDs are unique to Nebraska, and act as local government entities with broad responsibilities to protect Nebraska’s natural resources. Major Nebraska river basins form the boundaries of the 23 NRDs, enabling districts to respond to local conservation and resource management needs. Learn more about Nebraska’s NRDs at&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nrdnet.org/" target="_blank">www.nrdnet.org</a>.

Nebraska's Natural Resources DistrictLINCOLN, Nebraska&nbsp;– The Nebraska Association of Resources Districts hosts their annual Legislative Conference to highlight partnerships and discuss natural resources policy at the Lincoln Embassy Suites Jan. 28-29, 2025.The two-day conference brings together Natural Resources Districts (NRDs), elected officials and public-private partners integrally involved in conservation, technology, and policymaking. The conference also provides attendees an opportunity to learn how Nebraska’s NRDs work with landowners, state and federal agencies, and members of the public to protect Nebraska’s natural resources.Governor Jim Pillen will kick off the event Tuesday, Jan. 28, followed by a property tax reform panel with the Nebraska Chamber of Commerce, Nebraska Farm Bureau, and Nebraska Association of School Boards; and a discussion of proposed legislation of interest to the NRDs. During the evening Senators Reception, NRD leaders will meet with state senators to discuss natural resources challenges and successes in the districts.The conference continues Wednesday, Jan. 29, with breakout sessions for attendees, including:<ul>
 <li>Improving Nitrogen-Use Efficiency for Corn in Nebraska: In-Season Management</li><li>Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Dam Rehabilitation</li><li>Revitalizing Irrigation: Restoring Aging Canals for Sustainable Water Management</li><li>Update on Nebraska Department of Environment and Energy’s ONE RED Program</li><li>Examining the Effect of Fertilizer Application Practices on Soil Nitrate and Water Quality</li><li>Funding the Future: Strategies for Infrastructure Implementation</li><li>Maximizing Producer Profits through Carbon-Smart Practices and the 45Z Tax Credit</li><li>Nebraska Hydrology</li><li>Eastern Nebraska Water Resources Assessment (ENWRA) Recharge Mapping and Focus Area Assessments</li><li>Update on the Resilient Soils Act and the Nitrogen Reduction Act</li><li>Bringing Life Back to Methodist Cove: Harlan County Lake Ecosystem Restoration</li>
 </ul>More than 300 natural resources stakeholders are expected to attend the conference, which is presented by Nebraska’s Natural Resources Districts with a range of local and national sponsors including Blue Cross Blue Shield Nebraska, Eastern Nebraska Water Resources Assessment (ENWRA), HDR, Houston Engineering Inc., JEO Consulting Group, Olsson, Nebraska Department of Natural Resources, The Daugherty Water for Food Global Institute and The Nebraska Water Center.Conference registration is available on the Nebraska Association of Resources Districts’ website:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nrdnet.org/events" target="_blank">https://www.nrdnet.org/events</a>.The Nebraska Association of Resources Districts (NARD), the trade association for Nebraska's 23 Natural Resources Districts (NRD), works with individual districts to protect lives, property and the future of Nebraska’s natural resources. NRDs are unique to Nebraska, and act as local government entities with broad responsibilities to protect Nebraska’s natural resources. Major Nebraska river basins form the boundaries of the 23 NRDs, enabling districts to respond to local conservation and resource management needs. Learn more about Nebraska’s NRDs at&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nrdnet.org/" target="_blank">www.nrdnet.org</a>.

NRD Legislative Conference Brings Together Elected Leaders, Highlights Partnerships

The FDA is revoking the authorization for the use of FD&amp;C Red No. 3 as a matter of law, based on the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/changes-science-law-and-regulatory-authorities/part-iii-drugs-and-foods-under-1938-act-and-its-amendments">Delaney Clause</a>&nbsp;of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/laws-enforced-fda/federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act-fdc-act">Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&amp;C Act)</a>. The FDA is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2025-00830/petition-color-additive-center-for-science-in-the-public-interest-et-al-request-to-revoke-color">amending its color additive regulations</a>&nbsp;to no longer allow for the use of FD&amp;C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs in response to a 2022&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hfpappexternal.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/index.cfm?set=FAP-CAP&amp;id=CAP_3C0323&amp;sort=Petition_Type_Number&amp;order=ASC&amp;startrow=1&amp;type=basic&amp;search=red">color additive petition</a>.

The petition requested the agency review whether the Delaney Clause applied and cited, among other data and information, two studies that showed cancer in laboratory male rats exposed to high levels of FD&amp;C Red No. 3 due to a rat specific hormonal mechanism. The way that FD&amp;C Red No. 3 causes cancer in male rats does not occur in humans. Relevant exposure levels to FD&amp;C Red No. 3 for humans are typically much lower than those that cause the effects shown in male rats. Studies in other animals and in humans did not show these effects; claims that the use of FD&amp;C Red No. 3 in food and in ingested drugs puts people at risk are not supported by the available scientific information.&nbsp;

The Delaney Clause, enacted in 1960 as part of the Color Additives Amendment to the FD&amp;C Act, prohibits FDA authorization of a food additive or color additive if it has been found to induce cancer in humans or animals. This is not the first time the agency revoked an authorization based on the Delaney Clause. For example, in 2018, the FDA&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fda.gov/food/hfp-constituent-updates/fda-removes-7-synthetic-flavoring-substances-food-additives-list">revoked the authorization for certain synthetic flavors</a>&nbsp;based on the Delaney Clause in response to a food additive petition.&nbsp;

FD&amp;C Red No. 3 is a synthetic food dye that gives foods and drinks a bright, cherry-red color. The FDA estimates that FD&amp;C Red No. 3 is not as widely used in food and drugs when compared to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fda.gov/food/food-ingredients-packaging/color-additives-information-consumers">other certified colors</a>&nbsp;based on information available in third-party food product labeling databases, food manufacturers’ websites and other public information, and the FDA’s certification data. FD&amp;C Red No. 3 has been primarily used in certain food products, such as candy, cakes and cupcakes, cookies, frozen desserts, and frostings and icings, as well as certain ingested drugs.&nbsp;

Manufacturers who use FD&amp;C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs will have until January 15, 2027 or January 18, 2028, respectively, to reformulate their products. Other countries still currently allow for certain uses of FD&amp;C Red No. 3 (called erythrosine in other countries). However, foods imported to the U.S. must comply with U.S. requirements.

The FDA is revoking the authorization for the use of FD&amp;C Red No. 3 as a matter of law, based on the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/changes-science-law-and-regulatory-authorities/part-iii-drugs-and-foods-under-1938-act-and-its-amendments">Delaney Clause</a>&nbsp;of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/laws-enforced-fda/federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act-fdc-act">Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&amp;C Act)</a>. The FDA is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2025-00830/petition-color-additive-center-for-science-in-the-public-interest-et-al-request-to-revoke-color">amending its color additive regulations</a>&nbsp;to no longer allow for the use of FD&amp;C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs in response to a 2022&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hfpappexternal.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/index.cfm?set=FAP-CAP&amp;id=CAP_3C0323&amp;sort=Petition_Type_Number&amp;order=ASC&amp;startrow=1&amp;type=basic&amp;search=red">color additive petition</a>. <div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Today, the FDA is issuing an order to revoke the authorization for the use of FD&amp;C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs in response to a 2022 color additive petition that requested the agency to review whether the Delaney Clause applied. <a href="https://t.co/Qd0NFOIUz8">https://t.co/Qd0NFOIUz8</a> <a href="https://t.co/Bpr6XNC8OR">pic.twitter.com/Bpr6XNC8OR</a>&mdash; U.S. FDA Human Foods Program (@FDAfood) <a href="https://twitter.com/FDAfood/status/1879532094730227991?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 15, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>The petition requested the agency review whether the Delaney Clause applied and cited, among other data and information, two studies that showed cancer in laboratory male rats exposed to high levels of FD&amp;C Red No. 3 due to a rat specific hormonal mechanism. The way that FD&amp;C Red No. 3 causes cancer in male rats does not occur in humans. Relevant exposure levels to FD&amp;C Red No. 3 for humans are typically much lower than those that cause the effects shown in male rats. Studies in other animals and in humans did not show these effects; claims that the use of FD&amp;C Red No. 3 in food and in ingested drugs puts people at risk are not supported by the available scientific information.&nbsp;The Delaney Clause, enacted in 1960 as part of the Color Additives Amendment to the FD&amp;C Act, prohibits FDA authorization of a food additive or color additive if it has been found to induce cancer in humans or animals. This is not the first time the agency revoked an authorization based on the Delaney Clause. For example, in 2018, the FDA&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fda.gov/food/hfp-constituent-updates/fda-removes-7-synthetic-flavoring-substances-food-additives-list">revoked the authorization for certain synthetic flavors</a>&nbsp;based on the Delaney Clause in response to a food additive petition.&nbsp;FD&amp;C Red No. 3 is a synthetic food dye that gives foods and drinks a bright, cherry-red color. The FDA estimates that FD&amp;C Red No. 3 is not as widely used in food and drugs when compared to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fda.gov/food/food-ingredients-packaging/color-additives-information-consumers">other certified colors</a>&nbsp;based on information available in third-party food product labeling databases, food manufacturers’ websites and other public information, and the FDA’s certification data. FD&amp;C Red No. 3 has been primarily used in certain food products, such as candy, cakes and cupcakes, cookies, frozen desserts, and frostings and icings, as well as certain ingested drugs.&nbsp;Manufacturers who use FD&amp;C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs will have until January 15, 2027 or January 18, 2028, respectively, to reformulate their products. Other countries still currently allow for certain uses of FD&amp;C Red No. 3 (called erythrosine in other countries). However, foods imported to the U.S. must comply with U.S. requirements.

FDA Bans Red Dye No. 3 from Foods

&nbsp;PALM BEACH —The Presidential inauguration is January 20.&nbsp; On Tuesday night, the Chairman and CEO of Coca-Cola Company, James Quincey presented President-elect Trump the first ever Presidential Commemorative Inaugural Diet Coke bottle.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/1/1736905668769.png" alt="Photo courtesy Margo Martin Deputy Director of Communications, Donald J. Trump for President&nbsp;" />
 <figcaption>Photo courtesy Margo Martin Deputy Director of Communications, Donald J. Trump for President&nbsp;</figcaption>
 </figure>&nbsp;PALM BEACH —The Presidential inauguration is January 20.&nbsp; On Tuesday night, the Chairman and CEO of Coca-Cola Company, James Quincey presented President-elect Trump the first ever Presidential Commemorative Inaugural Diet Coke bottle.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/1/1736905639822.png" alt="" />
 <figcaption></figcaption>
 </figure>Trump is a long-time Diet Coke fanatic.

Coca-Cola gives Trump commemorative inaugural Diet Coke bottle

Lincoln, January 14, 2025- The Nebraska Public Service Commission has approved an Order(<a href="https://www.nebraska.gov/psc/orders/state911/2025-01-14%20911-075%20PI-248%20911-077%20C-5581%20PI-252%20Order%20Issuing%20Findings%20and%20Closing%20Investigation.pdf" target="_blank">911-075/PI-248, 911-077/C-5581/PI-252</a>) closing its investigation and issuing its findings into three separate 911 outages/disruptions involving telecommunications carrier Lumen.

The three separate Lumen outages/disruptions occurred on August 31, 2023, April 17 &amp; July 9,2024, impacting 911 service over a wide area of Lumens’ Nebraska network.

“Lumen guaranteed, and we expect Nebraska’s 911 system to be available 99.999 percent (five-nines) of the time, and that didn’t happen,” said Commission Chair Tim Schram.

Through its investigation and hearings, the Commission finds that Lumen’s level of performance was not acceptable for Nebraska’s 911 system and that the carrier failed to meet the level of service provided within its state contract.

Commission Chair Schram said, “While Lumen has engaged in substantial work to improve its network, the carrier’s lack of redundancy and diversity remains a concern.”

The Commission directed the State 911 Department to identify potential changes to the state’ scurrent 911 system. To support the process, Commission consultant 911 Authority will conduct an independent verification and validation of the Next Generation 911 system provided by Lumen.

State 911 Department Director, David Sankey said, “This independent testing is important to determine whether Lumen is capable of fulfilling its contractual obligations to provide the level of service the Commission expects and demands moving forward.”

Additional information to include the Order can be found on the PSC website at &lt;<a href="https://psc.nebraska.gov/lumen-affiliates-911-outage-investigation" target="_blank">https://psc.nebraska.gov/lumen-affiliates-911-outage-investigation</a>&nbsp;&gt;

Deb CollinsLincoln, January 14, 2025- The Nebraska Public Service Commission has approved an Order(<a href="https://www.nebraska.gov/psc/orders/state911/2025-01-14%20911-075%20PI-248%20911-077%20C-5581%20PI-252%20Order%20Issuing%20Findings%20and%20Closing%20Investigation.pdf" target="_blank">911-075/PI-248, 911-077/C-5581/PI-252</a>) closing its investigation and issuing its findings into three separate 911 outages/disruptions involving telecommunications carrier Lumen.The three separate Lumen outages/disruptions occurred on August 31, 2023, April 17 &amp; July 9,2024, impacting 911 service over a wide area of Lumens’ Nebraska network.“Lumen guaranteed, and we expect Nebraska’s 911 system to be available 99.999 percent (five-nines) of the time, and that didn’t happen,” said Commission Chair Tim Schram.Through its investigation and hearings, the Commission finds that Lumen’s level of performance was not acceptable for Nebraska’s 911 system and that the carrier failed to meet the level of service provided within its state contract.Commission Chair Schram said, “While Lumen has engaged in substantial work to improve its network, the carrier’s lack of redundancy and diversity remains a concern.”The Commission directed the State 911 Department to identify potential changes to the state’ scurrent 911 system. To support the process, Commission consultant 911 Authority will conduct an independent verification and validation of the Next Generation 911 system provided by Lumen.State 911 Department Director, David Sankey said, “This independent testing is important to determine whether Lumen is capable of fulfilling its contractual obligations to provide the level of service the Commission expects and demands moving forward.”Additional information to include the Order can be found on the PSC website at &lt;<a href="https://psc.nebraska.gov/lumen-affiliates-911-outage-investigation" target="_blank">https://psc.nebraska.gov/lumen-affiliates-911-outage-investigation</a>&nbsp;&gt;

PSC Closes Lumen Investigation, Issues Findings

Lincoln, January 14, 2025- The Nebraska Public Service Commission approved an Order(<a href="https://www.nebraska.gov/psc/orders/telecom/2025-01-14%20C-5561%20Order%20Issuing%20Grant%20Awards.pdf" target="_blank">C-5561</a>&nbsp;) awarding 22 grants totaling more than $20 million from the Nebraska Broadband Bridge Program (NBBP), the 4th&nbsp;grant cycle administered by the Commission through the program.

“The Nebraska Broadband Bridge Program has proven to be an effective tool to help bring broadband to unserved and underserved Nebraskans,” said Commission Chair Tim Schram.

Created by the Nebraska Broadband Bridge Act (Neb. Rev. Stat § 86 -301 to 86-1310), the NBBP provides approximately $20 million dollars annually for the development of broadband networks capable of at least 100/100 Mbps (down/up) in unserved and underserved areas of the state.

During the 2024 grant cycle, the Commission received, 27 applications for funding through the NBBP. Upon review of the applications and the challenges received the Commission determined22 submissions would be funded. The grants awarded, submitted by five providers, total$20,270,725. The deadline for projects funded through today’s awards is July 14, 2026.

Through four years of the program, the Commission has awarded over 140 grants, bringing broadband to more than 18,000 households.

Commissioner Schram said, “We are pleased to be able to support broadband expansion across the state through the NBBP and we look forward to the completion of these projects.”

A detailed list of approved projects and funding amounts as well as&nbsp;<a href="https://broadbandmap.nebraska.gov/" target="_blank">a link to an online map</a>&nbsp;of the approved projects is available through the PSC website on the&nbsp;<a href="https://psc.nebraska.gov/2024-nebraska-broadband-bridge-program" target="_blank">2024 Nebraska Broadband Bridge Program</a>&nbsp;page.

Deb CollinsLincoln, January 14, 2025- The Nebraska Public Service Commission approved an Order(<a href="https://www.nebraska.gov/psc/orders/telecom/2025-01-14%20C-5561%20Order%20Issuing%20Grant%20Awards.pdf" target="_blank">C-5561</a>&nbsp;) awarding 22 grants totaling more than $20 million from the Nebraska Broadband Bridge Program (NBBP), the 4th&nbsp;grant cycle administered by the Commission through the program.“The Nebraska Broadband Bridge Program has proven to be an effective tool to help bring broadband to unserved and underserved Nebraskans,” said Commission Chair Tim Schram.Created by the Nebraska Broadband Bridge Act (Neb. Rev. Stat § 86 -301 to 86-1310), the NBBP provides approximately $20 million dollars annually for the development of broadband networks capable of at least 100/100 Mbps (down/up) in unserved and underserved areas of the state.During the 2024 grant cycle, the Commission received, 27 applications for funding through the NBBP. Upon review of the applications and the challenges received the Commission determined22 submissions would be funded. The grants awarded, submitted by five providers, total$20,270,725. The deadline for projects funded through today’s awards is July 14, 2026.Through four years of the program, the Commission has awarded over 140 grants, bringing broadband to more than 18,000 households.Commissioner Schram said, “We are pleased to be able to support broadband expansion across the state through the NBBP and we look forward to the completion of these projects.”A detailed list of approved projects and funding amounts as well as&nbsp;<a href="https://broadbandmap.nebraska.gov/" target="_blank">a link to an online map</a>&nbsp;of the approved projects is available through the PSC website on the&nbsp;<a href="https://psc.nebraska.gov/2024-nebraska-broadband-bridge-program" target="_blank">2024 Nebraska Broadband Bridge Program</a>&nbsp;page.

PSC Awards 20 Million in Nebraska Broadband Bridge Program Grants

LINCOLN, NEB. – “On behalf of Nebraska agriculture, Nebraska Farm Bureau would like to extend our appreciation and highest gratitude for the leadership and service of Dr. Mike Boehm as the Vice Chancellor and Vice President of the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources (IANR).&nbsp;Nebraska agriculture partnership with the University of Nebraska and IANR is critical to the continued growth of the state’s largest industry. Mike solidified and grew that partnership in many areas during his nine-year tenure leading the Institute. Programs and services provided by IANR to farmers, ranchers, and rural Nebraskans are in much higher level in the areas of agricultural education, research, and extension. Mike’s visionary and innovative approach to many initiatives over his tenure will leave a legacy of progress that we in agriculture can build upon in the future. His accessibility, vision, and his passion for the IANR and agriculture has certainly made an impact on the future of Nebraska agriculture.”&nbsp; &nbsp;

The Nebraska Farm Bureau is a grassroots, state-wide organization dedicated to supporting farm and ranch families and working for the benefit of all Nebraskans through a wide variety of educational, service, and advocacy efforts. More than 56,000 families across Nebraska are Farm Bureau members, working together to achieve rural and urban prosperity as agriculture is a key fuel to Nebraska’s economy. For more information about Nebraska Farm Bureau and agriculture, visit&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nefb.org/" target="_blank">www.nefb.org</a>.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/1/1736886238005.jpeg" alt="Mark McHargue, Nebraska Farm Bureau President (Nebraska Farm Bureau)" />
 <figcaption>Mark McHargue, Nebraska Farm Bureau President (Nebraska Farm Bureau)</figcaption>
 </figure>Mark McHargueLINCOLN, NEB. – “On behalf of Nebraska agriculture, Nebraska Farm Bureau would like to extend our appreciation and highest gratitude for the leadership and service of Dr. Mike Boehm as the Vice Chancellor and Vice President of the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources (IANR).&nbsp;Nebraska agriculture partnership with the University of Nebraska and IANR is critical to the continued growth of the state’s largest industry. Mike solidified and grew that partnership in many areas during his nine-year tenure leading the Institute. Programs and services provided by IANR to farmers, ranchers, and rural Nebraskans are in much higher level in the areas of agricultural education, research, and extension. Mike’s visionary and innovative approach to many initiatives over his tenure will leave a legacy of progress that we in agriculture can build upon in the future. His accessibility, vision, and his passion for the IANR and agriculture has certainly made an impact on the future of Nebraska agriculture.”&nbsp; &nbsp;The Nebraska Farm Bureau is a grassroots, state-wide organization dedicated to supporting farm and ranch families and working for the benefit of all Nebraskans through a wide variety of educational, service, and advocacy efforts. More than 56,000 families across Nebraska are Farm Bureau members, working together to achieve rural and urban prosperity as agriculture is a key fuel to Nebraska’s economy. For more information about Nebraska Farm Bureau and agriculture, visit&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nefb.org/" target="_blank">www.nefb.org</a>.

   Statement by Mark McHargue, President, Regarding Mike Boehm Stepping Down

University of Nebraska Communication Department

After nearly a decade of successful leadership, Mike Boehm is stepping down in the dual role as the University of Nebraska’s Harlan Vice Chancellor for the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources and vice president for agriculture and natural resources.

Boehm will continue in the role through the spring semester before returning to a faculty role in the Department of Plant Pathology and working to help advance key university initiatives.&nbsp;Tiffany Heng-Moss, dean of the College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, will serve as the interim leader of IANR starting June 1.

In a Jan. 13 message to campus, Chancellor Rodney D. Bennett praised Boehm as a trusted partner and campus leader.

“Together, we have logged countless miles traveling across the state — from Nebraska City to Scottsbluff — meeting the remarkable people who make Nebraska unique,” Bennett said in the message to campus. “His dedication to IANR, the university and the state has been inspiring and impactful, leaving a legacy of progress and collaboration.”

A celebration for Boehm and his contributions to the university will be announced.

Through the spring semester, Boehm will work closely with Heng-Moss to ensure a smooth leadership transition.

Heng-Moss has served as dean of the College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources since 2019. She led the college as interim dean from 2017 to 2019 and was associate dean for five years. She has been a faculty member at the university since 2001.

“(Heng-Moss) is deeply connected to the agricultural community across the state and around the country, and she is an accomplished educator and researcher,” Bennett said. “She is ideally situated to lead the institute during this critical period.”

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/1/1736885195878.png" alt="Nebraska's Mike Boehm will step down at the end of the spring semester as the University of Nebraska’s Harlan Vice Chancellor for the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources and vice president for agriculture and natural resources." />
 <figcaption>Nebraska's Mike Boehm will step down at the end of the spring semester as the University of Nebraska’s Harlan Vice Chancellor for the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources and vice president for agriculture and natural resources.</figcaption>
 </figure>University of Nebraska Communication DepartmentAfter nearly a decade of successful leadership, Mike Boehm is stepping down in the dual role as the University of Nebraska’s Harlan Vice Chancellor for the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources and vice president for agriculture and natural resources.Boehm will continue in the role through the spring semester before returning to a faculty role in the Department of Plant Pathology and working to help advance key university initiatives.&nbsp;Tiffany Heng-Moss, dean of the College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, will serve as the interim leader of IANR starting June 1.In a Jan. 13 message to campus, Chancellor Rodney D. Bennett praised Boehm as a trusted partner and campus leader.“Together, we have logged countless miles traveling across the state — from Nebraska City to Scottsbluff — meeting the remarkable people who make Nebraska unique,” Bennett said in the message to campus. “His dedication to IANR, the university and the state has been inspiring and impactful, leaving a legacy of progress and collaboration.”A celebration for Boehm and his contributions to the university will be announced.Through the spring semester, Boehm will work closely with Heng-Moss to ensure a smooth leadership transition.Heng-Moss has served as dean of the College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources since 2019. She led the college as interim dean from 2017 to 2019 and was associate dean for five years. She has been a faculty member at the university since 2001.“(Heng-Moss) is deeply connected to the agricultural community across the state and around the country, and she is an accomplished educator and researcher,” Bennett said. “She is ideally situated to lead the institute during this critical period.”

Boehm to Step Down as IANR Leader

LINCOLN, NE&nbsp;– Governor Jim Pillen has joined 25 other Republican governors in a letter to Speaker of the House Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune requesting congressional cooperation when it comes to solidifying into law the efficiencies identified by President-elect Donald Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

The letter emphasizes a need for the federal government to begin living within its means, and points to successes that Republican governors have had in such efforts within their own states. The letter says in part:

“Finding efficiencies in the federal government is an important first step towards the ultimate goal of balancing the federal budget. Washington needs to remove wasteful spending and balance its budget to achieve long-term fiscal stability, promote economic growth, and protect our national security.”

Including Gov. Pillen, other governors who signed the letter include: Gov. Kay Ivey (AL), Gov. Mike Dunleavy (AK), Gov. Sarah Sanders (AR), Gov. Ron DeSantis (FL), Gov. Brian Kemp (GA), Gov. Brad Little (ID), Gov. Eric Holcomb (IN), Gov. Kim Reynolds (IA), Gov. Jeff Landry (LA), Gov. Tate Reeves (MS), Gov. Mike Parson (MO), Gov. Greg Gianforte (MT), Gov. Joe Lombardo (NV), Gov. Kelly Ayotte (NH), Gov. Kelly Armstrong (ND), Gov. Mike DeWine (OH), Gov. Kevin Stitt (OK), Gov. Henry Dargan McMaster (SC), Gov. Kristi Noem (SD), Gov. Bill Lee (TN), Gov. Greg Abbott (TX), Gov. Spencer Cox (UT), Gov. Glenn Youngkin (VA), Gov. Jim Justice (WV), and Gov. Mark Gordon (WY).

A copy of the letter is included with this release.

<a href="https://governor.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/press/Final-Joint-Letter-on-DOGE.pdf">Final-Joint-Letter-on-DOGE.pdf</a>

Office of Governor Jim PillenLINCOLN, NE&nbsp;– Governor Jim Pillen has joined 25 other Republican governors in a letter to Speaker of the House Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune requesting congressional cooperation when it comes to solidifying into law the efficiencies identified by President-elect Donald Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).The letter emphasizes a need for the federal government to begin living within its means, and points to successes that Republican governors have had in such efforts within their own states. The letter says in part:“Finding efficiencies in the federal government is an important first step towards the ultimate goal of balancing the federal budget. Washington needs to remove wasteful spending and balance its budget to achieve long-term fiscal stability, promote economic growth, and protect our national security.”Including Gov. Pillen, other governors who signed the letter include: Gov. Kay Ivey (AL), Gov. Mike Dunleavy (AK), Gov. Sarah Sanders (AR), Gov. Ron DeSantis (FL), Gov. Brian Kemp (GA), Gov. Brad Little (ID), Gov. Eric Holcomb (IN), Gov. Kim Reynolds (IA), Gov. Jeff Landry (LA), Gov. Tate Reeves (MS), Gov. Mike Parson (MO), Gov. Greg Gianforte (MT), Gov. Joe Lombardo (NV), Gov. Kelly Ayotte (NH), Gov. Kelly Armstrong (ND), Gov. Mike DeWine (OH), Gov. Kevin Stitt (OK), Gov. Henry Dargan McMaster (SC), Gov. Kristi Noem (SD), Gov. Bill Lee (TN), Gov. Greg Abbott (TX), Gov. Spencer Cox (UT), Gov. Glenn Youngkin (VA), Gov. Jim Justice (WV), and Gov. Mark Gordon (WY).A copy of the letter is included with this release.<a href="https://governor.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/press/Final-Joint-Letter-on-DOGE.pdf">Final-Joint-Letter-on-DOGE.pdf</a>

Gov. Pillen Joins Republican Governors Advocating Passage of DOGE Efficiencies

<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/01/13/lawsuit-against-nebraska-medical-cannabis-extended-to-regulatory-board-state-agencies/">Nebraska Examiner</a>

LINCOLN&nbsp;—&nbsp;The targets of a legal effort arguing that Nebraska’s voter-initiated legalization of medical cannabis is federally unconstitutional have been expanded to include a new regulatory commission, the state treasurer and two state agencies.

Attorneys for John Kuehn, a former state senator, a former member of the State Board of Health and a longtime marijuana opponent, amended&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/12/10/new-lawsuit-seeks-to-void-nebraska-medical-cannabis-ballot-measures/">his December lawsuit</a>&nbsp;on Friday to include broader swaths of state government overseeing implementation of the new medical cannabis laws.

The lawsuit first targeted Gov. Jim Pillen and Secretary of State Bob Evnen for allowing the measures to go into law, as well as the three ballot sponsors of the effort.

“In November 2024, taxpayers paid for two statewide votes which together sought to obtain an objective that was unconstitutional, unlawful and impossible: the legalization of the manufacturing, dispensing, and profiting from marijuana products for so-called medical purposes,” the amended complaint states.

Initiative Measure 437, to legalize up to 5 ounces of medical marijuana with a doctor’s written recommendation, passed with 71% of&nbsp;<a href="https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/elections/2024/2024%20General%20Canvass%20Book.pdf" target="_blank">voter support</a>. Initiative Measure 438, to create the state regulatory commission, passed with 67%&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/11/06/medical-cannabis-prevails-at-nebraskas-ballot-box-but-fate-depends-on-legal-challenges/">voter approval</a>.

Kuehn’s lawsuit argues that the “activist-drafted initiative measures,” whose sponsors include two of Kuehn’s former colleagues in the Legislature, had evaded any judicial review by the time of the vote.

This is the second complaint from Kuehn. His first is being&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/briefs/nebraska-supreme-court-to-consider-medical-cannabis-petition-signatures-challenge/">appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court</a>. Lancaster County District Judge Susan Strong in November&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/11/26/district-judge-sides-with-nebraska-medical-cannabis-ballot-sponsors-in-legal-challenge/">rejected arguments that the measures were placed on the ballot illegally</a>. A hearing on the appeal has not yet been scheduled.

Strong is presiding over Kuehn’s latest lawsuit. She was the same judge who&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/12/11/district-judge-lets-nebraska-medical-cannabis-laws-go-into-effect-as-second-lawsuit-continues/">rejected his last-minute attempt to block the measures from becoming law</a>. The laws&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/12/12/medical-cannabis-paid-sick-leave-abortion-restrictions-and-school-choice-repeal-take-effect/">took effect Dec. 12</a>.

Pillen and Attorney General Mike Hilgers have said “<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/12/12/medical-cannabis-paid-sick-leave-abortion-restrictions-and-school-choice-repeal-take-effect/">serious issues</a>” remain whether the measures are legal under federal law or the Nebraska Constitution.

The core of Kuehn’s argument in the second case remains that no state can legalize marijuana because it remains listed as a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dea.gov/drug-information/drug-scheduling" target="_blank">federal Schedule I drug</a>, which is defined as having no currently accepted medical use and having a high potential for abuse. Examples include heroin, ecstasy or LSD.

The federal government has been in the&nbsp;<a href="https://apnews.com/article/marijuana-biden-dea-criminal-justice-pot-f833a8dae6ceb31a8658a5d65832a3b8" target="_blank">process of changing the classification of marijuana</a>&nbsp;to a Schedule III drug, defined as drugs with a moderate to low potential for abuse that can be accessed with a prescription. Examples include ketamine, anabolic steroids, testosterone and Tylenol with codeine.

The new lawsuit argues that once the laws are fully implemented, the State Treasurer’s Office, Department of Revenue and Department of Health and Human Services would need to unconstitutionally expend public funds and employee time to carry out the laws.

The AG’s Office, which typically defends state officials in lawsuits, declined to comment. None of the new defendants had any immediate comment.

Briese and Kamm, the lawsuit alleges, would need to violate federal money laundering laws because marijuana would be subject to sales taxes, similar to over-the-counter drugs.

And Corsi’s department would need to investigate possible disciplinary complaints against health care practitioners who recommend cannabis to Nebraskans, the lawsuit alleges, to see whether the practitioners followed their scope of practice or professional conduct, which Kuehn argues includes following federal laws. DHHS also would need to expend taxpayer dollars to issue guidance for the measures.

A DHHS spokesperson declined to comment on the lawsuit, but he confirmed the department has received no complaints related to the new laws. Department officials have issued no guidance for implementing the ballot measures.

The Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission — consisting of Commissioners Bruce Bailey, Harry Hoch, Jr., and Kim Lowe and&nbsp;<a href="https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/elections/2024/2024%20Ballot%20Measures%20Pamphlet.pdf" target="_blank">up to two more members</a>&nbsp;as appointed by Pillen — is required to develop regulations for allowing medical cannabis sales in the state.

By&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/11/26/whats-next-for-nebraska-medical-cannabis-paid-sick-leave-abortion-school-choice/">July 1</a>, the new commission must establish criteria to accept or deny applications to license establishments&nbsp;to possess, manufacture, distribute, deliver or dispense medical marijuana. By Oct. 1, the commission must begin granting those registrations.

Until that time, it is illegal to purchase marijuana in Nebraska, and multiple advocates of the measures have expressed displeasure with many doctors refusing to recommend the drug.&nbsp;Advocates have argued the drug could help with seizures, chronic pain and other drug-resistant medical conditions.

The licensing framework is similar to that of the Liquor Control Commission.&nbsp;

The delegation to the Medical Cannabis Commission is similar to voter-approved gambling initiatives in 2020, which created the Nebraska Gaming Commission. Lawmakers merged that group with the existing Nebraska Racing Commission in 2021.

Briese, a former lawmaker, oversaw legislative efforts to implement voters’ wishes of three gambling-related ballot initiatives as chair of the Legislature’s General Affairs Committee.

That legislative committee, now led by State Sen. Rick Holdcroft of Bellevue, is expected to consider any legislation to tweak the medical cannabis measures, if introduced this year.

No such proposals have been introduced so far. Bill introductions continue through Jan. 22.

“While we understand and support reasonable rules and regulations – we will NOT support legislative attempts to subvert the will of the people, such as interfering with a health care practitioner’s ability to make a recommendation for alleviation of a patient’s medical condition, its symptoms or side effects of the condition’s treatment,” the Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana campaign said Sunday in a&nbsp;<a href="https://mailchi.mp/66f7577c812b/an-important-legislative-update?e=%5BUNIQID%5D" target="_blank">statement</a>.

Kuehn’s attorneys argue that the delegation of legislative authority to the unelected medical cannabis commission effectively freezes out “all other legislative or executive efforts to ensure the public’s health, safety and welfare.”

On Thursday, Kuehn’s attorneys sent letters to the regulatory commission members, Briese and the state department directors demanding that they refuse to implement the laws. The move was similar to the December push urging that Pillen not issue proclamations making the measures law.

“No matter is of greater public concern than preventing the government from burdening the taxpayer with the administrative costs of violating federal law,” the amended lawsuit states.

The public officials did not respond to the requests from Kuehn’s attorney based in Kansas City, Missouri.

Crista Eggers, one of three sponsors for the marijuana ballot measures,&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/12/10/new-lawsuit-seeks-to-void-nebraska-medical-cannabis-ballot-measures/">said in December</a>&nbsp;that the assertion the laws violate the U.S. Constitution “disregards decades of state-led independence and innovation.”

“Under the 10th Amendment of the Constitution, states have the right to address the unique needs of their citizens without undue interference,” Eggers, the campaign manager, said then. “The campaign remains committed to defending Nebraska’s medical cannabis laws to ensure patients and families have access to the care they deserve.”

Nebraska became the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ncsl.org/health/state-medical-cannabis-laws" target="_blank">39th state</a>&nbsp;to authorize some form of medical cannabis. Nearly every state has now legalized some form of cannabis or its derivatives. About two dozen states allow recreational marijuana sales and distribution.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/1/1736884767113.jpeg" alt="Supporters of medical cannabis helped two measures reach the 2024 general election ballot, Initiatives 437 and 438. Some spoke during a public hearing at the University of Nebraska at Omaha on Oct. 25, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)" />
 <figcaption>Supporters of medical cannabis helped two measures reach the 2024 general election ballot, Initiatives 437 and 438. Some spoke during a public hearing at the University of Nebraska at Omaha on Oct. 25, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)</figcaption>
 </figure>Zach Wendling<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/01/13/lawsuit-against-nebraska-medical-cannabis-extended-to-regulatory-board-state-agencies/">Nebraska Examiner</a>LINCOLN&nbsp;—&nbsp;The targets of a legal effort arguing that Nebraska’s voter-initiated legalization of medical cannabis is federally unconstitutional have been expanded to include a new regulatory commission, the state treasurer and two state agencies.Attorneys for John Kuehn, a former state senator, a former member of the State Board of Health and a longtime marijuana opponent, amended&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/12/10/new-lawsuit-seeks-to-void-nebraska-medical-cannabis-ballot-measures/">his December lawsuit</a>&nbsp;on Friday to include broader swaths of state government overseeing implementation of the new medical cannabis laws.The lawsuit first targeted Gov. Jim Pillen and Secretary of State Bob Evnen for allowing the measures to go into law, as well as the three ballot sponsors of the effort.The amended complaint now adds:<ul>
 <li>The three commissioners of the Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, who, by virtue of the voter initiatives, will compose a new Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission.</li><li>State Treasurer Tom Briese and Tax Commissioner Jim Kamm of the Nebraska Department of Revenue, who will oversee the new collection of sales taxes on medical cannabis.&nbsp;</li><li>CEO Steve Corsi of the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, whose department handles oversight of medical practitioners.</li>
 </ul>“In November 2024, taxpayers paid for two statewide votes which together sought to obtain an objective that was unconstitutional, unlawful and impossible: the legalization of the manufacturing, dispensing, and profiting from marijuana products for so-called medical purposes,” the amended complaint states.Initiative Measure 437, to legalize up to 5 ounces of medical marijuana with a doctor’s written recommendation, passed with 71% of&nbsp;<a href="https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/elections/2024/2024%20General%20Canvass%20Book.pdf" target="_blank">voter support</a>. Initiative Measure 438, to create the state regulatory commission, passed with 67%&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/11/06/medical-cannabis-prevails-at-nebraskas-ballot-box-but-fate-depends-on-legal-challenges/">voter approval</a>.<h2>Laws took effect Dec. 12</h2>Kuehn’s lawsuit argues that the “activist-drafted initiative measures,” whose sponsors include two of Kuehn’s former colleagues in the Legislature, had evaded any judicial review by the time of the vote.This is the second complaint from Kuehn. His first is being&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/briefs/nebraska-supreme-court-to-consider-medical-cannabis-petition-signatures-challenge/">appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court</a>. Lancaster County District Judge Susan Strong in November&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/11/26/district-judge-sides-with-nebraska-medical-cannabis-ballot-sponsors-in-legal-challenge/">rejected arguments that the measures were placed on the ballot illegally</a>. A hearing on the appeal has not yet been scheduled.Strong is presiding over Kuehn’s latest lawsuit. She was the same judge who&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/12/11/district-judge-lets-nebraska-medical-cannabis-laws-go-into-effect-as-second-lawsuit-continues/">rejected his last-minute attempt to block the measures from becoming law</a>. The laws&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/12/12/medical-cannabis-paid-sick-leave-abortion-restrictions-and-school-choice-repeal-take-effect/">took effect Dec. 12</a>.Pillen and Attorney General Mike Hilgers have said “<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/12/12/medical-cannabis-paid-sick-leave-abortion-restrictions-and-school-choice-repeal-take-effect/">serious issues</a>” remain whether the measures are legal under federal law or the Nebraska Constitution.The core of Kuehn’s argument in the second case remains that no state can legalize marijuana because it remains listed as a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dea.gov/drug-information/drug-scheduling" target="_blank">federal Schedule I drug</a>, which is defined as having no currently accepted medical use and having a high potential for abuse. Examples include heroin, ecstasy or LSD.The federal government has been in the&nbsp;<a href="https://apnews.com/article/marijuana-biden-dea-criminal-justice-pot-f833a8dae6ceb31a8658a5d65832a3b8" target="_blank">process of changing the classification of marijuana</a>&nbsp;to a Schedule III drug, defined as drugs with a moderate to low potential for abuse that can be accessed with a prescription. Examples include ketamine, anabolic steroids, testosterone and Tylenol with codeine.<h2>Expanded constitutional argument</h2>The new lawsuit argues that once the laws are fully implemented, the State Treasurer’s Office, Department of Revenue and Department of Health and Human Services would need to unconstitutionally expend public funds and employee time to carry out the laws.The AG’s Office, which typically defends state officials in lawsuits, declined to comment. None of the new defendants had any immediate comment.Briese and Kamm, the lawsuit alleges, would need to violate federal money laundering laws because marijuana would be subject to sales taxes, similar to over-the-counter drugs.And Corsi’s department would need to investigate possible disciplinary complaints against health care practitioners who recommend cannabis to Nebraskans, the lawsuit alleges, to see whether the practitioners followed their scope of practice or professional conduct, which Kuehn argues includes following federal laws. DHHS also would need to expend taxpayer dollars to issue guidance for the measures.A DHHS spokesperson declined to comment on the lawsuit, but he confirmed the department has received no complaints related to the new laws. Department officials have issued no guidance for implementing the ballot measures.The Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission — consisting of Commissioners Bruce Bailey, Harry Hoch, Jr., and Kim Lowe and&nbsp;<a href="https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/elections/2024/2024%20Ballot%20Measures%20Pamphlet.pdf" target="_blank">up to two more members</a>&nbsp;as appointed by Pillen — is required to develop regulations for allowing medical cannabis sales in the state.By&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/11/26/whats-next-for-nebraska-medical-cannabis-paid-sick-leave-abortion-school-choice/">July 1</a>, the new commission must establish criteria to accept or deny applications to license establishments&nbsp;to possess, manufacture, distribute, deliver or dispense medical marijuana. By Oct. 1, the commission must begin granting those registrations.Until that time, it is illegal to purchase marijuana in Nebraska, and multiple advocates of the measures have expressed displeasure with many doctors refusing to recommend the drug.&nbsp;Advocates have argued the drug could help with seizures, chronic pain and other drug-resistant medical conditions.The licensing framework is similar to that of the Liquor Control Commission.&nbsp;The delegation to the Medical Cannabis Commission is similar to voter-approved gambling initiatives in 2020, which created the Nebraska Gaming Commission. Lawmakers merged that group with the existing Nebraska Racing Commission in 2021.Briese, a former lawmaker, oversaw legislative efforts to implement voters’ wishes of three gambling-related ballot initiatives as chair of the Legislature’s General Affairs Committee.<h2>Possible legislative tweaks coming</h2>That legislative committee, now led by State Sen. Rick Holdcroft of Bellevue, is expected to consider any legislation to tweak the medical cannabis measures, if introduced this year.No such proposals have been introduced so far. Bill introductions continue through Jan. 22.“While we understand and support reasonable rules and regulations – we will NOT support legislative attempts to subvert the will of the people, such as interfering with a health care practitioner’s ability to make a recommendation for alleviation of a patient’s medical condition, its symptoms or side effects of the condition’s treatment,” the Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana campaign said Sunday in a&nbsp;<a href="https://mailchi.mp/66f7577c812b/an-important-legislative-update?e=%5BUNIQID%5D" target="_blank">statement</a>.Kuehn’s attorneys argue that the delegation of legislative authority to the unelected medical cannabis commission effectively freezes out “all other legislative or executive efforts to ensure the public’s health, safety and welfare.”On Thursday, Kuehn’s attorneys sent letters to the regulatory commission members, Briese and the state department directors demanding that they refuse to implement the laws. The move was similar to the December push urging that Pillen not issue proclamations making the measures law.“No matter is of greater public concern than preventing the government from burdening the taxpayer with the administrative costs of violating federal law,” the amended lawsuit states.The public officials did not respond to the requests from Kuehn’s attorney based in Kansas City, Missouri.<h2>10th Amendment of U.S. Constitution</h2>Crista Eggers, one of three sponsors for the marijuana ballot measures,&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/12/10/new-lawsuit-seeks-to-void-nebraska-medical-cannabis-ballot-measures/">said in December</a>&nbsp;that the assertion the laws violate the U.S. Constitution “disregards decades of state-led independence and innovation.”“Under the 10th Amendment of the Constitution, states have the right to address the unique needs of their citizens without undue interference,” Eggers, the campaign manager, said then. “The campaign remains committed to defending Nebraska’s medical cannabis laws to ensure patients and families have access to the care they deserve.”Nebraska became the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ncsl.org/health/state-medical-cannabis-laws" target="_blank">39th state</a>&nbsp;to authorize some form of medical cannabis. Nearly every state has now legalized some form of cannabis or its derivatives. About two dozen states allow recreational marijuana sales and distribution.

Lawsuit Against Nebraska Medical Cannabis Extended to Regulatory Board, State Agencies

LINCOLN, NE&nbsp;– Governor Jim Pillen issued the following statement concerning recent action by the Nebraska Public Service Commission (PSC), including the election of new leadership.

“I offer my congratulations to Commissioner Tim Schram and Commissioner Kevin Stocker on their elections last week as chairman and vice chair, respectively. I also express my gratitude to the conservative majority of the commission who voted to return PSC staff to the office by restoring pre-COVID office work policies. This directive was long overdue and catches this independent agency up with the rest of state government which, pursuant to my own executive order (EO 23-17), was ordered back to the workplace.

I call upon the PSC to hold its staff accountable in enforcing this directive, so that taxpayers receive the value and productivity they deserve out of this important agency. The PSC has critical work in its portfolio, including regulating much of Nebraska’s 911 system. That work deserves the full-time, in-person attention of both the commissioners and staff of the agency.”

Office of Governor Jim PillenLINCOLN, NE&nbsp;– Governor Jim Pillen issued the following statement concerning recent action by the Nebraska Public Service Commission (PSC), including the election of new leadership.“I offer my congratulations to Commissioner Tim Schram and Commissioner Kevin Stocker on their elections last week as chairman and vice chair, respectively. I also express my gratitude to the conservative majority of the commission who voted to return PSC staff to the office by restoring pre-COVID office work policies. This directive was long overdue and catches this independent agency up with the rest of state government which, pursuant to my own executive order (EO 23-17), was ordered back to the workplace.I call upon the PSC to hold its staff accountable in enforcing this directive, so that taxpayers receive the value and productivity they deserve out of this important agency. The PSC has critical work in its portfolio, including regulating much of Nebraska’s 911 system. That work deserves the full-time, in-person attention of both the commissioners and staff of the agency.”

 Gov. Pillen Issues Statement Regarding New PSC Leadership and Return to Office Resolution

<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/01/13/gov-pillen-ne-lawmakers-take-aim-at-social-media-and-school-time-cell-phone-use-by-youths/">Nebraska Examiner</a>

LINCOLN — Nebraskans under age 18 would need parental permission before opening a social media account under new legislation to be considered this year by state lawmakers.

The measure, to be introduced by State Sen. Tanya Storer of Whitman, was among four proposals promoted Monday by Gov. Jim Pillen and Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers at a news conference announcing legislation aimed at “protecting our kids” from online abuse and “addictive” phone apps and online services.

“Just as a parent must consent for a child to get their ears pierced, (consent) should also be required for access to platforms that collect personal data and expose children to potential harm,” Storer said during the event at the Governor’s Office that drew nine state senators.

“Social media poses inherent risk, and parents deserve the tools to make informed decisions about their children’s online safety,” said the newly elected lawmaker.

Storer and others at the event said state government needs to play a more active role in a minor’s access to online technology — as, they said, social media opens the door to bullying, sexual predators and a rise in mental health problems, including unhealthy obsessions with body flaws and higher risks of suicidal thoughts.

Under the Parental Rights in Social Media Act, which has yet to be formally introduced, social media companies would be required to verify age and get parental consent for a minor to create a social media account, Storer said.

Companies that do not follow the law would face civil violations, including a $2,500 fine per offense.

The bill, Storer said, was modeled after a Florida law that took effect this year, though it is less restrictive. Under the Florida law, social media sites are required to delete existing accounts for youths under age 14 within 90 days or face fines of up to $50,000.&nbsp;

Minors who are 14 and 15 years old can be on social media if they have parental consent. (The Florida attorney general is not enforcing the law pending a judge’s ruling on a request for a preliminary injunction.)

Just as a parent must consent for a child to get their ears pierced, (consent) should also be required for access to platforms that collect personal data and expose children to potential harm.

– State Sen. Tanya Storer of Whitman

Storer said the Nebraska proposal, as drafted, would not be “retroactive” and would not call for existing accounts to be deleted. As currently designed, she said, parental consent would be necessary for any social media accounts after the law takes effect.

“This isn’t a ban,” Storer said. “It’s simply giving parents the control to monitor.”

ACLU Nebraska, a nonprofit civil rights watchdog, said it had not yet seen the bill’s language and therefore could not fully react. But spokesman Sam Petto said he anticipates that the ACLU would have concerns regarding free speech rights.

For his part, Pillen said online technology is “not the real world” and needs regulation that Nebraska should have had two years ago.

Hilgers noted that he has four children. He said today’s pressures on kids, especially girls, from the digital and online world are unlike any other time in history.

Other legislative proposals announced during the news conference included:

LB 140, by State Sen. Rita Sanders of Bellevue, would require all school boards of a public school district to develop and establish a policy restricting student use of cellphones while in school, on school property or attending a school function.

Some districts, including Bellevue Public Schools, already have adopted restrictive guidelines, Sanders said. She noted that her proposal leaves “local control” for districts to craft guidelines for an approach that fits with needs of their area — be it rural, suburban or urban.

Sanders said her motive is to support the academic growth of students by creating a learning environment free of “distractions.”

“We know how distracting our cell phones can be,” she said. “We know that the phone usage has been found to correlate with lower test scores.”

The proposal allows school districts to lay out exceptions for emergencies or special circumstances, including when cell phones are authorized by a teacher or necessary for health reasons.

Petto said he doesn’t foresee ACLU Nebraska opposing that bill, and is pleased to see that Sanders considered exceptions for students with special needs and disabilities and also that it does not focus on looking at the content on a cell phone.

If adopted, the law would take effect prior to the next school year.

While Pillen encouraged “no phones bell to bell,” he also went as far as to recommend what he admitted can not be enforced: a “no phones in bed” rule for youths.&nbsp;

“We obviously can’t legislate it,” Pillen said of the bed rule. But, he added, “Seriously, grandparents, parents, if you’re allowing your child to take a phone to bed you’re absolutely hampering that child … that’s pure science out there.”

LB 172, introduced by State Sen. Brian Hardin of Gering and supported by Pillen and Hilgers, would outlaw computer-generated child pornography.

Currently, Hardin said, state law does not clearly define or prohibit the creation of sexually exploitative material made by artificial intelligence or through the digital manipulation of a youth’s picture or video.

Violation of the “Child Pornography Prevention Act” would be a felony offense. Hardin said it provides tools for law enforcement officials to investigate and stop such actions.

State Sen. Carolyn Bosn of Lincoln said she plans to introduce the “Age-Appropriate Online Design Code Act” targeting social media companies at the design stage.

“This bill says algorithms shouldn’t track children,” Bosn said of the bill. Since the bill has not been formally introduced, the ACLU said it could not fully size up its potential impact.

According to Bosn, the legislation puts “the best interests of children over company profits” and would give parents “the ability to have control over the child’s private information through accessible and easy to use tools without undermining the First Amendment.”

Officials said the bill requires social media and other online services to design features that prevent: compulsive use of their product; severe psychological harm such as anxiety and depression; identity theft and privacy violations.

It requires social media companies to provide parents the ability to manage their child’s privacy and account settings and to restrict the hours of use of these services.

Hilgers said he considers all the measures enforceable.

“Some of the biggest threats to children originate online, through cell phones, social media and child sexual abuse material,” he said.&nbsp;

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/1/1736884618181.jpeg" alt="State Sen. Rita Sanders of Bellevue speaks at a news conference Monday during which Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen, Attorney General Mike Hilgers and lawmakers took aim at social media and school-hours cell phone use by Nebraska youths. (Cindy Gonzalez/Nebraska Examiner)" />
 <figcaption>State Sen. Rita Sanders of Bellevue speaks at a news conference Monday during which Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen, Attorney General Mike Hilgers and lawmakers took aim at social media and school-hours cell phone use by Nebraska youths. (Cindy Gonzalez/Nebraska Examiner)</figcaption>
 </figure>Cindy Gonzalez<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/01/13/gov-pillen-ne-lawmakers-take-aim-at-social-media-and-school-time-cell-phone-use-by-youths/">Nebraska Examiner</a>LINCOLN — Nebraskans under age 18 would need parental permission before opening a social media account under new legislation to be considered this year by state lawmakers.The measure, to be introduced by State Sen. Tanya Storer of Whitman, was among four proposals promoted Monday by Gov. Jim Pillen and Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers at a news conference announcing legislation aimed at “protecting our kids” from online abuse and “addictive” phone apps and online services.“Just as a parent must consent for a child to get their ears pierced, (consent) should also be required for access to platforms that collect personal data and expose children to potential harm,” Storer said during the event at the Governor’s Office that drew nine state senators.“Social media poses inherent risk, and parents deserve the tools to make informed decisions about their children’s online safety,” said the newly elected lawmaker.Storer and others at the event said state government needs to play a more active role in a minor’s access to online technology — as, they said, social media opens the door to bullying, sexual predators and a rise in mental health problems, including unhealthy obsessions with body flaws and higher risks of suicidal thoughts.Under the Parental Rights in Social Media Act, which has yet to be formally introduced, social media companies would be required to verify age and get parental consent for a minor to create a social media account, Storer said.Companies that do not follow the law would face civil violations, including a $2,500 fine per offense.<h2>‘Not the real world’</h2>The bill, Storer said, was modeled after a Florida law that took effect this year, though it is less restrictive. Under the Florida law, social media sites are required to delete existing accounts for youths under age 14 within 90 days or face fines of up to $50,000.&nbsp;Minors who are 14 and 15 years old can be on social media if they have parental consent. (The Florida attorney general is not enforcing the law pending a judge’s ruling on a request for a preliminary injunction.)Just as a parent must consent for a child to get their ears pierced, (consent) should also be required for access to platforms that collect personal data and expose children to potential harm.– State Sen. Tanya Storer of WhitmanStorer said the Nebraska proposal, as drafted, would not be “retroactive” and would not call for existing accounts to be deleted. As currently designed, she said, parental consent would be necessary for any social media accounts after the law takes effect.“This isn’t a ban,” Storer said. “It’s simply giving parents the control to monitor.”ACLU Nebraska, a nonprofit civil rights watchdog, said it had not yet seen the bill’s language and therefore could not fully react. But spokesman Sam Petto said he anticipates that the ACLU would have concerns regarding free speech rights.For his part, Pillen said online technology is “not the real world” and needs regulation that Nebraska should have had two years ago.Hilgers noted that he has four children. He said today’s pressures on kids, especially girls, from the digital and online world are unlike any other time in history.<h2>Other legislation</h2>Other legislative proposals announced during the news conference included:LB 140, by State Sen. Rita Sanders of Bellevue, would require all school boards of a public school district to develop and establish a policy restricting student use of cellphones while in school, on school property or attending a school function.Some districts, including Bellevue Public Schools, already have adopted restrictive guidelines, Sanders said. She noted that her proposal leaves “local control” for districts to craft guidelines for an approach that fits with needs of their area — be it rural, suburban or urban.Sanders said her motive is to support the academic growth of students by creating a learning environment free of “distractions.”“We know how distracting our cell phones can be,” she said. “We know that the phone usage has been found to correlate with lower test scores.”The proposal allows school districts to lay out exceptions for emergencies or special circumstances, including when cell phones are authorized by a teacher or necessary for health reasons.Petto said he doesn’t foresee ACLU Nebraska opposing that bill, and is pleased to see that Sanders considered exceptions for students with special needs and disabilities and also that it does not focus on looking at the content on a cell phone.If adopted, the law would take effect prior to the next school year.While Pillen encouraged “no phones bell to bell,” he also went as far as to recommend what he admitted can not be enforced: a “no phones in bed” rule for youths.&nbsp;“We obviously can’t legislate it,” Pillen said of the bed rule. But, he added, “Seriously, grandparents, parents, if you’re allowing your child to take a phone to bed you’re absolutely hampering that child … that’s pure science out there.”LB 172, introduced by State Sen. Brian Hardin of Gering and supported by Pillen and Hilgers, would outlaw computer-generated child pornography.Currently, Hardin said, state law does not clearly define or prohibit the creation of sexually exploitative material made by artificial intelligence or through the digital manipulation of a youth’s picture or video.Violation of the “Child Pornography Prevention Act” would be a felony offense. Hardin said it provides tools for law enforcement officials to investigate and stop such actions.State Sen. Carolyn Bosn of Lincoln said she plans to introduce the “Age-Appropriate Online Design Code Act” targeting social media companies at the design stage.“This bill says algorithms shouldn’t track children,” Bosn said of the bill. Since the bill has not been formally introduced, the ACLU said it could not fully size up its potential impact.According to Bosn, the legislation puts “the best interests of children over company profits” and would give parents “the ability to have control over the child’s private information through accessible and easy to use tools without undermining the First Amendment.”Officials said the bill requires social media and other online services to design features that prevent: compulsive use of their product; severe psychological harm such as anxiety and depression; identity theft and privacy violations.It requires social media companies to provide parents the ability to manage their child’s privacy and account settings and to restrict the hours of use of these services.Hilgers said he considers all the measures enforceable.“Some of the biggest threats to children originate online, through cell phones, social media and child sexual abuse material,” he said.&nbsp;

Gov. Pillen, Lawmakers Take Aim at Youth Social Media and Cell Phone Use

<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/01/13/first-time-homebuyer-savings-account-new-sales-taxes-proposed-by-nebraska-senators/">Nebraska Examiner</a>

LINCOLN — A state lawmaker seeking a universal homestead exemption for Nebraska homeowners is also proposing tax incentives for new first-time homebuyer savings accounts.

State Sen. John Cavanaugh of Omaha introduced&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59387" target="_blank">Legislative Bill 151</a>&nbsp;to create the “First-Time Homebuyers Savings Account Act.” It would allow taxpayers to annually offset a certain portion of federal adjusted gross income into the savings account —&nbsp;$4,000 for married taxpayers filing a joint tax return, or $2,000 for others with the new account.&nbsp;

The maximum values would increase with inflation starting in 2027. Tax-deductible contributions could continue for up to 10 calendar years, or the date of the account holder’s first withdrawal of funds not related to qualified home purchases.

Cavanaugh said the goal is “to make the dream of home ownership a little bit more realistic for more Nebraskans.”

<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59327" target="_blank">LB 152</a>, also from Cavanaugh, reintroduces a proposal from the Legislature’s summer special session on property taxes. It would offer tax relief targeting owner-occupied properties — a&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/briefs/ne-lawmaker-calls-proposed-homestead-exemption-universal-relief-for-husker-homeowners/">homestead exemption for the first&nbsp;</a><a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/briefs/ne-lawmaker-calls-proposed-homestead-exemption-universal-relief-for-husker-homeowners/">$100,000&nbsp;</a>of a home’s value —&nbsp;rather than giving relief to “big out-of-state property owners,” such as Ted Turner or Bill Gates.

Cavanaugh estimated it could provide about $2,000 in targeted relief for average homeowners in Douglas County at less cost than similar relief efforts for all owners, including corporations or those living out of state.

Lawmakers also have begun to introduce measures to expand the state sales taxes to more goods or services that currently aren’t taxed, partly to fund new tax relief programs.

Among those are&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59353" target="_blank">LB 169</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59157" target="_blank">LB 170</a>, from State Sen. Tom Brandt of Plymouth. State Sen. Myron Dorn of Adams is cosponsoring both measures.

LB 169 would extend the tax to two dozen “luxury” items, such as lobbying or dating services, and that Brandt coined as “low-hanging fruit.” The taxes would begin Oct. 1.&nbsp;

The items are similar to those identified by former Omaha State Sens. Lou Ann Linehan and Justin Wayne at the end of the summer special session.&nbsp;

A majority of lawmakers in summer 2024&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/09/02/a-timeline-of-the-nebraska-legislatures-summer-property-tax-debate-april-18-to-aug-21/">refused to eliminate some sales tax exemptions</a>, even as the list of possible targets dwindled from&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/07/14/gov-pillens-property-tax-plan-would-add-new-taxes-on-120-goods-and-services-draft-indicates/">more than 120</a>&nbsp;to&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/briefs/property-tax-debate-to-pick-up-friday-as-nebraska-lawmakers-continue-to-seek-broader-relief/">12</a>&nbsp;by the end of the summer.

Brandt’s list, estimated to bring in $25-30 million annually, includes:

As drafted, the bill would also add sales taxes to household pet veterinary services and to memberships to or purchases by accredited zoos or aquariums. Brandt said that isn’t his intent and that he would amend his bill with help from the Revenue Committee.

In 2024, lawmakers defined massages as part of health care, and Brandt said he and about four or five lawmakers who helped craft the list could find another exemption to remove.

Asked what’s different now from last summer, Brandt said: 17 new senators.

Zach Wendling<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/01/13/first-time-homebuyer-savings-account-new-sales-taxes-proposed-by-nebraska-senators/">Nebraska Examiner</a>LINCOLN — A state lawmaker seeking a universal homestead exemption for Nebraska homeowners is also proposing tax incentives for new first-time homebuyer savings accounts.State Sen. John Cavanaugh of Omaha introduced&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59387" target="_blank">Legislative Bill 151</a>&nbsp;to create the “First-Time Homebuyers Savings Account Act.” It would allow taxpayers to annually offset a certain portion of federal adjusted gross income into the savings account —&nbsp;$4,000 for married taxpayers filing a joint tax return, or $2,000 for others with the new account.&nbsp;The maximum values would increase with inflation starting in 2027. Tax-deductible contributions could continue for up to 10 calendar years, or the date of the account holder’s first withdrawal of funds not related to qualified home purchases.Cavanaugh said the goal is “to make the dream of home ownership a little bit more realistic for more Nebraskans.”<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59327" target="_blank">LB 152</a>, also from Cavanaugh, reintroduces a proposal from the Legislature’s summer special session on property taxes. It would offer tax relief targeting owner-occupied properties — a&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/briefs/ne-lawmaker-calls-proposed-homestead-exemption-universal-relief-for-husker-homeowners/">homestead exemption for the first&nbsp;</a><a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/briefs/ne-lawmaker-calls-proposed-homestead-exemption-universal-relief-for-husker-homeowners/">$100,000&nbsp;</a>of a home’s value —&nbsp;rather than giving relief to “big out-of-state property owners,” such as Ted Turner or Bill Gates.Cavanaugh estimated it could provide about $2,000 in targeted relief for average homeowners in Douglas County at less cost than similar relief efforts for all owners, including corporations or those living out of state.<h2>Proposed sales tax expansion</h2>Lawmakers also have begun to introduce measures to expand the state sales taxes to more goods or services that currently aren’t taxed, partly to fund new tax relief programs.Among those are&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59353" target="_blank">LB 169</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59157" target="_blank">LB 170</a>, from State Sen. Tom Brandt of Plymouth. State Sen. Myron Dorn of Adams is cosponsoring both measures.LB 169 would extend the tax to two dozen “luxury” items, such as lobbying or dating services, and that Brandt coined as “low-hanging fruit.” The taxes would begin Oct. 1.&nbsp;The items are similar to those identified by former Omaha State Sens. Lou Ann Linehan and Justin Wayne at the end of the summer special session.&nbsp;A majority of lawmakers in summer 2024&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/09/02/a-timeline-of-the-nebraska-legislatures-summer-property-tax-debate-april-18-to-aug-21/">refused to eliminate some sales tax exemptions</a>, even as the list of possible targets dwindled from&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/07/14/gov-pillens-property-tax-plan-would-add-new-taxes-on-120-goods-and-services-draft-indicates/">more than 120</a>&nbsp;to&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/briefs/property-tax-debate-to-pick-up-friday-as-nebraska-lawmakers-continue-to-seek-broader-relief/">12</a>&nbsp;by the end of the summer.Brandt’s list, estimated to bring in $25-30 million annually, includes:<ul>
 <li>Pet grooming services.</li><li>Tattoos and body modification services.</li><li>Nail care services.</li><li>Hair care and removal services (but not hair cuts).</li><li>Skin care services.</li><li>Dry cleaning services.</li><li>Local passenger transportation by chartered road vehicles, such as limousines and similar “luxury” vehicles.</li><li>Sightseeing services by ground vehicles.</li><li>Travel agency services.</li><li>Weight loss services.</li><li>Telefloral delivery services.</li><li>Dating services.</li><li>Golf, dance and tennis lessons.</li><li>Swimming pool cleaning and maintenance services.</li><li>Interior design and decorating services.</li><li>Lobbying services.</li><li>Marketing and telemarketing services.</li><li>Chartered flights.</li><li>Massage services.</li><li>Pinball machines.</li><li>Film rentals.</li><li>Certain purchases by museums, including fine art.</li><li>Historic automobile museum sales, leases, rentals, storage or use.</li><li>Admissions to nationally accredited nonprofit zoos or aquariums.</li>
 </ul>As drafted, the bill would also add sales taxes to household pet veterinary services and to memberships to or purchases by accredited zoos or aquariums. Brandt said that isn’t his intent and that he would amend his bill with help from the Revenue Committee.In 2024, lawmakers defined massages as part of health care, and Brandt said he and about four or five lawmakers who helped craft the list could find another exemption to remove.<h2>‘A breath of fresh air’</h2>Asked what’s different now from last summer, Brandt said: 17 new senators.“It’s always good to get a breath of fresh air in the chamber, and I think it’s good that they’ll come in with an open mind, take a fresh look at this, and the fact that we’re starting out $432 million in the hole,” Brandt said, referring to a&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/01/07/speaker-arch-nebraska-budget-without-a-doubt-biggest-issue-of-2025-session/">projected state budget shortfall</a>&nbsp;by summer 2027.Brandt’s LB 170 would add sales taxes to soft drinks and candy, defined as:<ul>
 <li>Soft drinks — Nonalcoholic beverages that contain natural or artificial sweeteners. The bill would not tax beverages with milk or milk products; soy, rice or similar milk substitutes; or that contain greater than 50% of vegetable or fruit juice by volume.</li><li>Candy — Preparation of sugar, honey or other natural or artificial sweeteners combined with chocolate, fruits, nuts or other ingredients or flavorings in the form of bars, drops or pieces. Such foods that are prepared with flour or that need refrigeration would not be taxed.</li>
 </ul>Brandt also introduced&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=58969" target="_blank">LB 171</a>, which would pause the state’s multi-year plan to reduce top income and corporate tax rates. Instead of going down to 3.99% by the start of 2027, the top tax rates would freeze at 4.99% for taxable years after Jan. 1, 2026.“They are forecasting better times ahead, and I certainly hope they’re correct, but on the off chance that that doesn’t happen and they needed to do something, it would be sitting there,” Brandt said of his bill.<h2>Other new proposals</h2>Those proposals were among&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/calendar/legislation.php?day=2025-01-13" target="_blank">67 bills or constitutional amendments</a>&nbsp;introduced Monday, as introductions continue through Jan. 22.Other items introduced Monday include:<ul>
 <li><a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59361" target="_blank">LB 131</a>, by State Sen. Tony Sorrentino of Omaha, would open up state educational savings plans for college to include private elementary and secondary schools.</li><li><a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=58971" target="_blank">LB 137</a>, by State Sen. George Dungan of Lincoln, would prohibit homeowners associations from restricting the installation of solar panels or pollinator gardens.</li><li><a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=58954" target="_blank">LB 141</a>, by State Sen. Victor Rountree of Bellevue, would require credible reports of child abuse or neglect of a member of a military family to be reported to the appropriate military authorities and any appropriate military family advocacy program established to address child abuse and neglect in military families.</li><li><a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=58865" target="_blank">LB 143</a>, also by Rountree, would require local K-12 schools to accept children of military families for preliminary enrollment, regardless of whether the child has an individualized family service plan, individualized education plan, requires special accommodations or services under Section 504 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or receives special education.</li><li><a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59054" target="_blank">LB 147</a>, by State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair, would allow school districts to suspend students in pre-kindergarten through second grade.&nbsp;The prohibition started in 2023 led by State Sen. Terrell McKinney of Omaha. He had argued that it was hard for young students to&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2023/01/18/omaha-senator-pushes-parole-board-changes-marijuana-decriminalization/">bounce back after being suspended</a>&nbsp;and that suspensions&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ketv.com/article/omaha-teachers-question-suspension-law/60336070" target="_blank">disproportionately impacted students of color</a>.</li><li><a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=58835" target="_blank">LB 155</a>, by State Sen. Brian Hardin of Gering, would allow people to use deadly force to defend their vehicles from carjacking, unless they were the initial aggressor.</li>
 </ul><ul>
 <li><a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59138" target="_blank">LB 165</a>, from State Sen. Megan Hunt of Omaha, would allow municipalities or counties to&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/briefs/legislature-passes-nebraska-needle-exchange-program/">authorize syringe services programs</a>&nbsp;to distribute hypodermic, sterile syringes to reduce the spread of infectious diseases. The bill addresses one of the concerns Gov. Jim Pillen raised when he&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Untitled.pdf">vetoed</a>&nbsp;Hunt’s measure in 2024: whether minors could access the programs. One lawmaker who sustained Pillen’s veto, after voting for the bill, co-sponsored Hunt’s measure: State Sen. Rick Holdcroft of Bellevue. Hunt fell&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_votes.php?KeyID=10299" target="_blank">three votes short</a>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/03/12/lawmakers-fail-to-override-veto-of-nebraska-safe-syringe-programs/">overriding</a>&nbsp;the&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/briefs/pillen-vetoes-nebraska-safe-syringes-program-legislation-as-expected/">veto</a>.</li><li><a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59182" target="_blank">LB 189</a>, by State Sen. Machaela Cavanaugh of Omaha, would create baseline standards for paid family and medical leave, beginning Jan. 1, 2028.</li><li><a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59588" target="_blank">LB 190</a>, also by Sen. Machaela Cavanaugh, would require the Legislature’s Performance Audit Committee to create a rotating schedule so that all state agencies are audited every five years, rather than on a case-by-case basis.</li><li><a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=58805" target="_blank">Legislative Resolutions 10CA</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=58806" target="_blank">11CA</a>, also by Hardin, would impose consumption or excise taxes on all new goods and services, except groceries (10CA), and eliminate all taxes other than retail consumption and excise taxes (11CA). The effort is the “EPIC Option,” to eliminate property, income and corporate taxes.</li>
 </ul>